Technology, energy, agriculture transport AIC

Maksym ZAYETS – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Agricultural Engineering and Technical Services of the Polissia National University (Bulvar Stariy St., 7, Zhytomyr, 10008, Ukraine, e-mail: mzaec81@gmail.com, http://orcid.org / 0000-0002-2290-1892).
Volodymyr KULYKIVSKYI – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Agricultural Engineering and Technical Services of the Polissia National University (Bulvar Stariy St., 7, Zhytomyr, 10008, Ukraine, e-mail: kylikovskiyv@ukr.net, http://orcid.org / 0000-0002-4652-0285).

The implementation of seeding technologies with minimum or zero tillage offers a wide range of economic and environmental advantages. Among the most significant benefits are the improvement of soil structure and fertility, reduction of erosion and degradation processes, preservation of soil moisture, and substantial savings in fuel consumption and labor. These advantages make no-till and minimum-till systems increasingly relevant for modern sustainable agriculture, particularly under conditions of climate change and soil exhaustion.
However, successful operation in no-till systems poses new engineering challenges, especially related to the performance of disc openers when cutting through dense crop residues. Residue cover remaining on the soil surface after harvest (e.g., wheat straw, maize stalks) creates resistance to the movement of sowing equipment, which can negatively affect seed placement accuracy, depth uniformity, and overall field emergence.
Theoretical studies have shown that the diameter of the disc opener influences key parameters such as the depth of soil penetration, thickness of residue layers to be cut, and the compression angle required for effective slicing. Larger discs can penetrate deeper, but they may also face increased rolling resistance and interact differently with moist or compacted residues.
Experimental research conducted in this study revealed that disc openers with a diameter of 380 mm–regardless of specific shape–demonstrated the best performance in cutting winter wheat straw under two moisture conditions:natural straw moisture (W = 10.1%)Field moisture (W = 22.3%)
It was observed that active disc rotation at increased forward speeds (characterized by a speed ratio λ > 1.37 and λ = 1.58) led to a higher degree of residue fragmentation, in contrast to passive rotation where the disc rolls freely in contact with the soil surface (λ = 1.0). This suggests that excessive forward speed can negatively affect residue handling by increasing mechanical disruption rather than clean cutting.
Furthermore, serrated disc openers were found to be more effective at cutting straw than smooth-edged discs, owing to their improved grip and cutting action. However, their performance was still strongly influenced by the moisture content of the straw, with drier residues being easier to cut cleanly, while higher moisture levels increased resistance and often led to clogging or smearing.
These findings underscore the importance of optimizing disc opener parameters–such as diameter, edge design, and operating speed–for effective operation in conservation tillage systems. The results can assist in improving the design of seeding machinery for no-till applications and in enhancing overall seeding performance under high-residue field conditions.

1.    Koriakovskyi, A. V., & Bakirov, F. H. (2011). Samorozpushennia gruntu pid vplyvom solomianoi mulchi [Self-loosening of the soil under the influence of straw mulch]. Ahronomiia ta lisove hospodarstvo – Agronomy and Forestry, 22, 21–23. [in Ukrainian]
2.    Zaiets, M. L. (2021). Rezultaty doslidzhennia vplyvu rivnomirnosti rozpodilu pozhnyvnykh reshtok na hlybynu sivby ta urozhainist silskohospodarskykh kultur. Konstruiuvannia, vyrobnytstvo ta ekspluatatsiia silskohospodarskykh mashyn – Design, Production and Operation of Agricultural Machines, 51, 36–46. [in Ukrainian]
3.    Titova, L. L. (2018). Syntez mekhanizmiv pryvodu vysivnykh aparativ posivnykh mashyn [Synthesis of drive mechanisms for seeding units of sowing machines]. AhrarMediaHrup. [in Ukrainian]
4.    Sysolin, P. V., Osypov, I. M., & Sysolina, I. P. (2008). Ukraine patent No. 34019. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian]
5.    Nielsen, K., et al. (1998). Sustained oscillations in glycolysis: An experimental and theoretical study of chaotic and complex periodic behavior and of quenching of simple oscillations. Biophysical Chemistry, 72(1–2), 49–62. [in English].
6.    Zaiets, M. L. (2008). Obgruntuvannia optymalnoi velychyny ekstsentrysytetu ustanovky rozpodilnyka soshnyka dlia rozkydnoho sposobu sivby silskohospodarskykh kultur. Konstruiuvannia, vyrobnytstvo ta ekspluatatsiia silskohospodarskykh mashyn, 38, 87–91. [in Ukrainian]
7.    Zaiets, M. L. (2013). Ne ihnoruimo eksperymentalni soshnyky z kombinovanym rozpodiliuvachem posivnoho materialu. Zerno i khlib, 2(70), 36–39. [in Ukrainian]
8.    Hevko, B. M., Liashchuk, O. L., Pavelchuk, Yu. F., et al. (2013). Tekhnolohichni osnovy proektuvannia i vyhotovlennia posivnykh mashyn [Monograph]. Ternopil National Technical University. [in Ukrainian]
9.    Sviren, M. O. (2018). Naukovo-tekhnolohichni osnovy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti roboty vysivnykh aparativ posivnykh mashyn [Scientific and technological foundations for improving the efficiency of seeding units of sowing machines] (Doctoral dissertation abstract). National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. . [in Ukrainian]
10.    Vlasenko, V. M. (1993). Ekolohichni vymohy do gruntoobrobnoho znariaddia i posivnykh mashyn. Traktory i silskohospodarski mashyny, 9, 14–17. [in Ukrainian]
11.    Van Oost, K., Cerdan, O., & Quine, T. A. (2009). Accelerated sediment fluxes by water and tillage erosion on European agricultural land. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34, 1625–1634. [in English]
12.    Doan, V., Chen, Y., & Irvine, B. (2005). Effect of residue type on the performance of no-till seeder openers. Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 47, 29–35. [in English]
13.    Kushwaha, R. L., Vaishnav, A. S., & Zoerb, G. C. (1986). Soil bin evaluation of disc coulter under no-till crop residue conditions. Transactions of the ASAE, 29, 40–44. [in English]
14.    Hemmat, A., Adamchuk, V. I., & Jasa, P. (2008). Use of an instrumented disc coulter for mapping soil mechanical resistance. Soil & Tillage Research, 98, 150–163. [in English]
15.    Fallahi, S., & Raoufat, M. H. (2008). Row-crop planter attachments in a conservation tillage system: A comparative study. Soil & Tillage Research, 98, 27–34. [in English]
16.    Karayel, D. (2009). Performance of a modified precision vacuum seeder for no-till sowing of maize and soybean. Soil & Tillage Research, 104, 121–125. [in English]
17.    Linke, C. (2006). Entwicklung der Direktsaat. Landtechnik, 61, 312–313. [in German]