Engineering, Energy, Transport AIC

Victor Anisimov – Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of “Agroengineering and Technical Service” of the Vinnitsa National Agrarian University (3 Solnechnaya St, Vinnitsa, 21008, Ukraine, e-mail: anisimov@vsau.vin.ua, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3349-1630).
Anatoliy Yelenych – Assistant of the Department of “Agroengineering and Technical Service” of the Vinnitsa National Agrarian University (3 Solnechnaya St, Vinnitsa, 21008, Ukraine, e-mail: a.elenech@ukr.net, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-1822).

In modern research, the problem of recognition is increasingly focused on the fact that the implementation of procedures for recognizing objects, phenomena, and situations, processes of any natural or socio-economic nature requires the construction of special recognition systems. The need for a systematic approach to the problem of recognition is due to a number of reasons.
The first is that recognition is not the goal. It is only a means of obtaining the information needed by the management system to make a particular decision, behavioral strategy or management strategy. As a result, the recognition system must be designed in such a way as to ensure the greatest efficiency of the control system above the recognition system. This means the subordination of the goals of the recognition system to the goals of the management system.
The second reason is that the efficiency of the recognition system as a whole directly depends on the efficiency of technical means of the recognition system (measuring and computing) and its mathematical software - software-implemented algorithms for constructing descriptions of classes of objects and phenomena in sign language, proper recognition descriptions, etc. This in turn means the subordination of the goals of the means of recognition system to the goals of the system as a whole.
Thus, a tree of goals is formed - a characteristic feature of the need for a system-technical approach to the problem. If we take into account that the development of the recognition system and its elements are usually subject to restrictions - material, labor, time constraints, etc., the more obvious becomes the legitimacy of this approach.
This article discusses system-wide issues of object and phenomenon recognition.

[1]    Kutkovetsʹkyy, V. YA. (2003). Rozpiznavannya obraziv. Mykolayiv: Vydavnytstvo MDHU im. P. Mohyly. [in Ukrainian].
[2]    Zayatsʹ, V.M., Kaminsʹkyy R.M. (2004). Metody rozpiznavannya obraziv: Posibnyk. Lʹviv: V-vo NU «LP». [in Ukrainian].
[3]    Teoriya rozpiznavannya obraziv: navchalʹnyy posibnyk. (2013). Havrylenko V. V., Ivanchenko H. F., Shevchenko H. YE. K.: NTU. [in Ukrainian].
[4]    Dovbysh, A.S. (2015). Osnovy teoriyi rozpiznavannya obraziv: navchalʹnyy posibnyk.: u 2-kh ch. CH. Sumy: SumDU. S. [in Ukrainian].
[5]    Kutkovetsʹkyy, V. YA. (2017). Rozpiznavannya obraziv: navchalʹnyy posibnyk. Mykolayiv: Vyd-vo CHNU im. Petra Mohyly. [in Ukrainian].
[6]    Anisimov, V., Yakovenko, A. (2001). Bahatofaktornyy zvʺyazok parametriv v malykh vidkhylennyakh, shcho kharakteryzuye tekhnichnyy stan dyzelʹnoyi palyvnoyi aparatury. Polska Akademia Nauk Oddzial Wlublinie. Vol. 1, 51–58. [in Ukrainian].
[7]    Anisimov, V.F., Ryaboshapka V.B. (2005). Doslidzhennya bahatofaktornoho zvʺyazku parametriv systemy mashchennya i zhyvlennya dyzelya v malykh vidkhylennyakh. MOTROL, Tom 1, 48–55. [in Ukrainian].
[8]    Anisimov, V.F., Ryaboshapka, V.B. (2005). Bahatofaktornyy zvʺyazok potuzhnosti dyzelya z parametramy robochoho tsyklu v malykh vidkhylennyakh. Promyslova hidravlika i pnevmatyka, 2(8), 123–127. [in Ukrainian].
[9]    Anisimov, V.F., Muzychuk, V.Y., Slobodyan, N.M. (2015). Matematychna modelʹ vporskuvannya palyva v malykh vidkhylennyakh dlya vyznachennya zalyshkovoho resursu dyzelʹnoyi palyvnoyi aparatury. Tekhnichni nauky, 1(89), 68–75. [in Ukrainian].
[10]    Anisimov, V., Ryaboshapka, V. (2016). Modeling of machine – tractor units workelow on the of biofuels. Naukovi vidomosti, 21 (207), 74–75. [in English].