Engineering, Energy, Transport AIC

Vitalii YAROPUD – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (St. Soniachna, 3, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, 21008, e-mail: yaropud77@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-1356).

The article presents the results of numerical modeling of thermal processes in vertical ground heat exchangers of concentric and U-shaped types aimed at improving the energy efficiency of microclimate control systems in agro-industrial facilities. Analytical studies of pneumatic losses demonstrated that their magnitude is nearly identical for both configurations, while the capacity of the U-shaped heat exchanger exceeds that of the concentric design by 0.9–1.7 %, confirming the feasibility of its further application. Dependencies of the U-shaped exchanger’s capacity on its geometric parameters (length, diameter) and air flow rate were established, enabling optimization of its structural characteristics.
Numerical simulations conducted in Simcenter Star-CCM+ provided spatial distributions of temperature fields under various operating conditions. It was shown that, in summer, the air flow temperature decreases by 7.2 °C in the concentric and by 8.5 °C in the U-shaped exchanger, whereas in winter, the corresponding increases amount to 8.1 °C and 9.3 °C, respectively. Characteristic zones of minimum and maximum temperature values were identified at a depth of 26.75–28.50 m, which substantiates the necessity of thermal insulation within the range of 1.50–3.25 m to maintain system efficiency.
Further data processing in Wolfram Cloud enabled the derivation of second-order regression equations describing the relationships between the change in air flow temperature and effective thermal capacity with respect to inlet air temperature and air flow rate. This allowed the determination of optimal flow rates: 453.8 m³/h for the concentric and 455.2 m³/h for the U-shaped exchanger. Under these conditions, the thermal capacity of the concentric scheme ranges from 1052 to 1266 W depending on the season, while that of the U-shaped exchanger varies from 1235 to 1575 W.
The obtained results indicate that the U-shaped heat exchanger demonstrates 17–24 % higher efficiency compared to the concentric one, making it a promising solution for use in energy-efficient microclimate systems and providing a foundation for the development of adaptive control algorithms.

1.    Kaletnik, G.M. (2008). Energy supply of Ukraine and possibilities of using potential sources of renewable energy. Visnyk agrarnoyi nauky, 10, 50–55. [in Ukrainian].
2.    Dolhikh, D.O. (2012). Analysis and classification of ground heat exchangers. Mechanization, ecologization and conversion of bio-raw materials in animal husbandry: Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanization of Animal Husbandry NAAS, 1(9), 56–63. [in Ukrainian].
3.    Blázquez, C.S., Bruno, J.C., Rigola, J. and Coronas, A. (2023). Multiparametric evaluation of electrical, biogas and natural gas geothermal source heat pumps. In Geothermal Heat Pump Systems. Cham: Springer, 103–122. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24524-4_4. [in English].
4.    Dolhikh, D.O. (2017) Substantiation of structural and technological parameters of a ground heat exchanger for ventilation of livestock premises. PhD thesis. National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
5.    Kaletnik, H.M., Yaropud, V.M. (2022). Results of numerical simulation of geothermal cooling in the ventilation system of livestock premises. Vibrations in engineering and technology, 3(106), 5–12. DOI: 10.37128/2306-8744-2022-3-1. [in Ukrainian].
6.    Almutairi, K. (2022). Applications of intelligent techniques in modeling geothermal heat pumps: an updated review. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 17, 910–918. DOI: 10.1093/ijlct/ctac061. [in English]
7.    Karami, M., Delfani, S. and Esmaeelian, J. (2022). Recent progress in geothermal heat pumps. in Recent Advances in Renewable Energy Technologies. Elsevier, 287–320. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823532-4.00001-X. [in English].
8.    Hou, G., Liu, Z., Zhao, M., Taherian, H., Jiang, W. and Chen, D. (2021). Underground energy: utilization of geothermal shallow heat pumps. in Jeguirim, M. (ed.) Recent Advances in Renewable Energy Technologies. Academic Press, 211–247. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91093-4.00002-0. [in English].
9.    Halilovic, S., García Gil, A., Vázquez-Suñé, E., Carrera, J. (2023). Optimization approaches for the design and operation of open-loop shallow geothermal systems. Advances in Geosciences, 62, 57–66. DOI: 10.5194/adgeo-62-57-2023. [in English].
10.    Kaletnik, H., Yaropud, V., Lutkovska, S., Aliiev, E. (2024). Studying the air flow heating process in the vertical type ground heat exchanger. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, 100(10), 46–54. DOI: 10.15199/48.2024.10.08. [in English].
11.    Kaletnik, G., Yaropud, V. and Babyn, I. (2024) Development of resource-saving technical and technological support for production and animal husbandry. Boston, USA: Primedia. DOI:  10.46299/979-8-89619-784-3. [in English].
12.    Kayaci, N. and Demir, H. (2018). Numerical modelling of transient soil temperature distribution for horizontal ground heat exchanger of ground source heat pump. Geothermics, 73, 33–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.01.009. [in English].
13.    Tang, F., Li, Y., Wang, L., Zhao, J. and Guo, Y. (2021). A numerical study into effects of soil compaction and heat storage on thermal performance of a horizontal ground heat exchanger. Renewable Energy, 172, 740–752. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.025. [in English].
14.    Hałaj, E., Pająk, L. and Papiernik, B. (2020). Finite element modeling of geothermal source of heat pump in long-term operation. Energies, 13(6), 1341. DOI: 10.3390/en1306134. [in English].
15.    Kovyazin, O.S. and Dolhikh, D.O. (2013). Substantiation of the construction of a ground heat exchanger. Bulletin of Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, 132, 167–170. [in Ukrainian].
16.    Kovyazin, O.S. (2018). Substantiation of the diameter of the casing pipe of the ground heat exchanger and the air supply into it. Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI». Series: Power and Heat Engineering Processes and Equipment, 12(1288), 71–74. DOI: 10.20998/2078-774X.2018.12.13. [in Ukrainian].
17.    Yaropud, V.M. (2024). Study of the efficiency of functioning of the mechatronic system for ensuring the microclimate of livestock premises. Engineering, Energy, Transport of AIC, 1(124), 56–72. DOI: 10.37128/2520-6168-2024-1-7. [in English].
18.    Sydorchuk, B., Naumchuk, O. and Mazurek, P. (2021). Modeling of joint operation of a ground soil heat exchanger and a thermal pump evaporator. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 22(2), 256–261. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/131177. [in Ukrainian].
19.    Jalaluddin, J., Akio, M., Koutaro, T. and Kentaro, Y. (2010). Thermal performances of three types of ground heat exchangers in short-time period of operation. International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. 1123. URL: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iracc/1123. [in English].
20.    Yaropud, V.M. (2016) Substantiation of design and operating parameters of a heat recuperator for livestock premises. PhD thesis. Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. [in Ukrainian].
21.    Zhukovskyi, S.S. (2003) Aerodynamics of ventilation. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic National University. [in Ukrainian].
22.    Kupchuk, I.M., Yaropud, V.M., Telekalo, N.V. and Hranyak, V.F. (2020). Prospects and prerequisites for the introduction of autonomous power supply systems of agro-industrial enterprises. Engineering, Energy, Transport of AIC, 3(110), 51–63. DOI: 10.37128/2520-6168-2020-3-5. [in Ukrainian].